Back to blog

Future-proof your content strategy: Headless CMS vs traditional CMS

The Contentstack TeamAug 21, 20247 min read
Blog_Headless_4.png
Talk to an expert about something you read on this page

Discover what makes a headless CMS different than a traditional CMS. The latter focuses on simplicity, low cost, but the former is more versatile, customizable and supports multiple channels. To learn how we can help you understand which type of CMS is better for business, talk to us.

Highlights

You’ll learn about why you should choose a headless CMS over a traditional CMS:

  • A headless CMS has a decoupled architecture, which splits the front and back end
  • The API-driven approach ensures seamless integration with third-party apps
  • Handles high traffic and large content volumes effortlessly
  • Delivers consistent content across the web, mobile and IoT platforms
  • Provides a personalized experience on various channels

Unlock your brand's potential—move to a headless CMS today.


What’s the key thing your customers crave from your brand? A seamless user experience. Although integrated user experience seems simple, achieving it is complex if you don’t know where to begin. Enters a content management system (CMS).

There are different types of content management systems, but which one will serve your business needs? A traditional CMS offers front-end template and back-end content management solutions, but it feels restrictive for companies looking for a flexible and scalable solution. As a result, companies are moving to a powerful and versatile headless CMS option.

In this blog, we explore headless CMS vs traditional, their pros and cons and learn which platform is best for your business. 

What is a traditional CMS?

A traditional CMS uses a monolithic architecture in which the front end, the presentation layer, depends on the back end, the content library. This means changes to the front end affect the back end. WordPress and Drupal are traditional platforms that offer a simple website-based experience.

These platforms provide user-friendly dashboards, allowing all your users to publish, organize and manage content. But, the tightly coupled structure makes the platform less scalable and flexible. 

Features of traditional CMS

Monolithic architecture

Traditional CMS works on a monolithic structure. In a traditional platform, the front and back end are coupled, creating and displaying content in the same system.

WYSIWYG editors

These content management tools and systems use a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editor, helping you create and update content.

Integrated templates and themes

WordPress is a traditional platform for building websites and blogs. It provides a library of templates and themes filled with ready-to-use designs.

What is a headless CMS?

A headless CMS is a content management repository where content is served via an application programming interface (API) to any device. The major characteristic of a headless CMS is that any changes in one layer, the presentation or the front end, are independent of changes in the other layer, the content or the back end layer. A headless CMS platform is API-first, helping developers connect the CMS with other systems.

A headless CMS like Contentstack delivers content to any channel or device, allowing your developers to create experiences no longer constrained by a CMS's functionalities.

Overcome traditional CMS issues with Contentstack: Are you tired of slow development times and rising costs due to legacy monolithic suites? Contentstack offers a modern, component-based solution designed for the needs of today's enterprises. Discover agility and improved ROI. Request a demo to learn more.

Features of a headless CMS

API-first approach

An API-first approach means your content is available via APIs to be delivered to your site, app and other digital platforms. As a result, your digital content presentation becomes flexible and you provide a consistent user experience.

Decoupled architecture

A headless CMS uses a decoupled architecture. It allows developers to use desired technologies for the front end and provides a personalized user experience across various platforms. 

Omnichannel publishing

A headless CMS manages your content delivery across device and digital touchpoints, increasing the impact of your messaging.

Content versioning and collaboration tools

Headless CMS offers content versioning, one of its significant strengths. Your teams can manage and build better and more accurate content.

Case study: How Contentstack improved Burberry’s content creation and e-commerce efficiency?

Burberry, a global fashion brand, wanted to enhance its content creation and e-commerce competencies. They adopted Contentstack’s headless CMS for improved speed, flexibility and effectiveness in delivering its content across different touchpoints and languages. The company reduced developer support requests and increased the publishing speed by 80%. Now, Burberry can publish and edit content while respecting creativity and innovation.

After using Burberry, Sonia Latoracca, Digital Commerce Content Manager at Burberry, said:

“Creating content is quicker and easier with Contentstack. It’s a user-friendly tool making training and onboarding simpler. The integration with our translation and media systems means content can be created and published much quicker than before. The flexible, reuseable components allow us to complete new designs briefs without the need for constant development.”

Read the case study here.

Key differences between a headless CMS vs traditional CMS

Feature/Aspect

Traditional CMS

Headless CMS

Architecture

Monolithic

Decoupled (API-driven)

Content Delivery

Integrated with the frontend

Via APIs to any frontend

Flexibility

Limited customization

High flexibility and customization

Scalability

Less scalable

Highly scalable

Ease of use

User-friendly, especially for non-tech users

Requires more technical expertise

Cost

Generally more cost-effective

Potentially higher costs due to complexity

Security

Can have more security vulnerabilities

Enhanced security with API-driven approach

Omnichannel support

Limited

Excellent

User experience

Consistent, but limited to web-based platforms

Provides consistent user experience for various platforms

Integration capabilities

Standard integrations available out-of-the-box

Requires custom integrations 

Development speed

Faster initial setup because of pre-built templates

Slower initial development but faster iteration and scaling

Maintenance requirements

Lower maintenance due to an integrated environment

Higher maintenance because you have to manage multiple components

Headless CMS vs Traditional CMS

Let’s understand these differences in depth:

Content delivery

While traditional CMS delivers content directly through its built-in front end, Headless CMS sends content via an application programming interface to any frontend framework. This makes it adaptable for web, mobile devices and IoT platforms.

Flexibility

A traditional CMS offers limited flexibility, whereas a headless CMS is flexible because the front and back end are decoupled.

Scalability

Traditional CMS cannot scale because of its monolithic design. Headless CMS, however, is built to scale quickly and effortlessly handle lots of content and high traffic. 

Cost

Traditional CMS is more economical due to its all-in-one nature. Headless CMS can be pricier due to its complexity and additional development needs.

Security

Traditional CMSs can be more prone to security issues because their front and back end are linked. Headless CMS increases security by separating these layers, minimizing risk.

Omnichannel support

Traditional CMSes have limited omnichannel delivery and focus mainly on web development. Headless CMSes distribute content across various channels and devices.

User experience

Traditional CMS offers consistent web-based user experiences. Headless CMS provides a versatile user experience optimized for various platforms and ensures consistency everywhere.

Integration capabilities

Traditional CMS lacks personalization. A headless CMS requires custom integrations, making your website more adaptable.

Development speed

Traditional CMS has a quick initial setup with pre-made templates. Meanwhile, Headless CMS takes longer to set up because its flexible architecture enables faster updates and scaling.

IDC MarketScape recognizes Contentstack's excellence, naming us a Leader in Headless CMS by IDC MarketScape, Contentstack demonstrates a future-proof CMS strategy, R&D pace in innovation, and exceptional customer delivery. Discover how we can elevate your digital experiences. Request a demo to learn more.

Pros and cons of a traditional CMS

Pros:

  • Easy to manage your content and website architecture with a user-friendly interface
  • Helps you manage your website and content without any technical knowledge or expertise
  • A vast community of developers helping you overcome potential challenges of using the platform
  • Offers a library of plugins and themes to choose from
  • More affordable than their headless counterparts

Cons

  • Cannot deliver content on multiple digital platforms like mobile, social media, IoT and smart devices
  • Doesn’t align with the growing customer demands because of its monolithic architecture
  • Limited or no integration with third-party tools, making it less future-proof
  • Prone to security issues and vulnerabilities
  • Changes in the design or functionality require adjustments in the back end
  • Requires time and effort for regular maintenance

Pros and cons of a headless CMS

Pros:

  • The separation of the back end and the front end provides flexibility in editing content
  • The API-driven approach ensures omnichannel content delivery
  • Easily integrates with third-party applications
  • Easier to edit and update content for non-technical users
  • Offers a higher degree of personalization 
  • Easily integrates with the latest technologies, future-proofing your business
  • Delivers consistent content across multiple channels and devices

Cons:

  • High level of expertise to set up and maintain the system
  • Not ideal for companies that resist changes

When to use each CMS?

Traditional CMS

Best for: Small businesses, non-profits, individuals

Ideal scenarios:

  • Limited budget
  • Quick setup
  • Minimal technical resources

Real-world examples

Blogs

If you’re running a personal blog or a company blog, traditional CMSs are perfect. They let you publish posts, manage media and organize your content without hassle.

Small business sites

Traditional platforms are ideal for small businesses requiring a simple website to showcase their services and products. They’re quick to set up and affordable.

Non-profits

Traditional CMSs are efficient and budget-friendly for non-profits, requiring a straightforward site to share information, manage events or process donations.

Headless CMS

Best for: Large enterprises, complex digital ecosystems

Ideal scenarios:

  • Omnichannel content delivery
  • High scalability
  • Extensive customization


Headless CMS solutions like Contentstack separate the content management part from the front-end presentation layer. This means all your content is maintained in one location and then redistributed across various websites, mobile apps and IoT devices using APIs.

Real-world examples

E-commerce platforms

E-commerce companies use a headless architecture to manage product information, marketing content and customer reviews across their web, mobile apps and in-store displays.

Media companies

Media outlets that publish content to various channels use a headless CMS to keep their content consistent across multiple platforms.

Personalized user experiences

A headless CMS lets you integrate with other systems to offer personalized content based on user preferences.

Bottom line

If you need something simple, quick and budget-friendly, go for a traditional CMS. However, enterprises with complex content needs must choose a headless platform to reach their users. 

FAQs

How is a traditional CMS different from a headless CMS?

A traditional CMS combines the back and front end, whereas a headless CMS separates them. It uses APIs to send content to any front end.

Is headless CMS better?

A headless CMS is preferable because it makes the system more adaptable and flexible. It’s effective for complex and multi-channel marketing communication and content creation.

What is the difference between headless and full CMS?

A full CMS includes the back end (content management) and the front end (content delivery). A headless CMS manages the back end component, using APIs for front-end delivery.

When to use a traditional CMS?

You can use a traditional CMS if you have a:

  • Limited budget
  • Need a quick setup
  • Minimal technical resources. 

A traditional platform is an excellent choice for small businesses and non-profits.

Learn more

Selecting the appropriate CMS requires some time, but a good CMS has all the necessary options to deliver content on your digital media channels while providing a seamless experience at every stage.

If you are still stuck with the traditional monolithic CMS platforms, it's time for you to be a part of a headless CMS. For more information, talk to us today

Share on:

About Contentstack

The Contentstack team comprises highly skilled professionals specializing in product marketing, customer acquisition and retention, and digital marketing strategy. With extensive experience holding senior positions in notable technology companies across various sectors, they bring diverse backgrounds and deep industry knowledge to deliver impactful solutions.  

Contentstack stands out in the composable DXP and Headless CMS markets with an impressive track record of 87 G2 user awards, 6 analyst recognitions, and 3 industry accolades, showcasing its robust market presence and user satisfaction.

Check out our case studies to see why industry-leading companies trust Contentstack.

Experience the power of Contentstack's award-winning platform by scheduling a demo, starting a free trial, or joining a small group demo today.

Follow Contentstack on Linkedin

Background.png