The costs of adopting composable architecture
While determining tech stack pricing in monoliths is relatively easy, the entire decision-making process is lengthy due to the involvement of multiple decision-making units.
Composable architectures, on the other hand, meet dynamic business requirements and are far more affordable than legacy systems. For this reason, adopting composable application architecture will reduce software management costs significantly by 2024, as per Gartner.
How?
Let's find out.
Selection costs
Like decision-making, the request for proposal (RFP) process in monolith systems is elaborate and complex, covering every facet of a digital commerce system. The POCs of such architectures are also complicated and time-consuming to craft since all functionalities are tightly coupled. On the flip side, the request for proposal (RFP) scope of a modular architecture is streamlined, focusing only on the critical functionalities.
Additionally, composable commerce offers easily accessible free trial periods via the vendor's website.
Planning costs
Though a composable approach includes an elaborate MVP (minimum viable product) design phase, the solution can be implemented incrementally through a "strangler" pattern, ensuring a smooth and eventual function-by-function transition without disrupting the existing system. The process lowers risks and reduces end-to-end planning and coordination.
Development and customization costs
The development cost for a composable commerce system is much lower since component customization is achieved using flexible APIs. As modular structures feature existing backend functionalities, developers can focus on creating the front ends, accelerating the development cycle.
Additionally, instead of developing all components from scratch, brands can build their solution using the best-of-breed components tailored to their specific needs. Finally, incremental launching using an MVP leads to faster realization of investments, in contrast to a monolith structure where any investment made in customization is wasted with a shift to a newer platform.
Integration & migration costs
Myth: Integration and migration costs to composable architecture are higher, requiring the internal integration of components to create a cohesive solution.
Truth: That's not the case.
Let's not forget the API first approach with flexible APIs that make way for easier decoupling and lower integration costs of MACH-based composable stacks.
Training costs
Developers using a composable solution need to understand the entire system and its components, but the training costs are significantly reduced. Because these components follow the MACH architecture, they're easy to learn, making it quicker for development teams. This helps cut down on training costs.
Reduced hardware maintenance
Contrary to traditional architectures requiring rigorous hardware maintenance, MACH architecture prioritizes scaling and maintenance of required composables. The paradigm shift in maintenance can reduce hardware maintenance costs over time. However, it has to be evaluated to see how different composables add value or turn out to be more cost-effective than monoliths.
Streamlined resource management
Adopting composable architecture simplifies resource management greatly, allowing efficient allocation of resources. Further, MACH architecture reduces operational overhead costs significantly, enabling efficient cost savings in the long run for composables.
While the initial adoption of composable architecture requires careful planning and investment, the long-term cost savings potential is substantial. Companies can unlock substantial cost reductions, streamline processes, and enhance scalability by adhering to principles like MACH-aligned composables, prioritizing extensibility, and ensuring team alignment. Such a strategic shift isn't just about technology — it's a move toward a more economical and agile future for your organization.
Invest in a technological transformation
One cannot deny the transformative potential that a shift toward composable architecture holds for organizations seeking to optimize their operations, minimize expenditures, and boost scalability. It is true that this transition demands preliminary strategizing and investment; however, the enduring advantages it offers are indisputable.
Composable architecture goes beyond merely streamlining resource management, reducing training expenses, and diminishing hardware upkeep. It introduces an unprecedented degree of adaptability and versatility by leveraging modular, top-quality components. Hence, embracing this strategic tactic is not just a technological transformation. It signifies a stride towards a future that promises greater cost efficiency, agility and prosperity for your organization.
Share on